Individuality versus group!
Just as Pollock poses a question of what would be wrong with the photos
of women, I also actually do. Pollock discloses a group of women who involved
in art and media practice, art history and feminist criticism, were the Women’s
Art History Collective was formed in order to attempt for some analysis of
women ‘s position in, and in relation to the history of art representations. (Pollock
126) These women had sensed an unfamiliar representation of women in art, and by
1972 they tended to take an initiative to improve the situation. They were not
the only; many have been standing up for women representation take a case of
the ‘Guerrilla girls' Though many
initiatives have been taken, the truth is that the state of women
representation lies in this formula of ‘womanhood
versus individual woman’ this implies that women turn themselves into objects of gaze. Take an example of Heleen
van Royen, with all her exposure in the world as a prominent novel writer, she
decided to swim in the opposite direction compared Women’s Art History
Collective. She exposed her body for her own interests following the
individualism principle.
Again, in an interview with the show of Humberto Tan, the son of Heleen
who had escorted his mother was confronted with a question of what he thought
when he had heard that his mother was going to do that what she did. The answer
was that; he also found it frightening, but he could swallow it because it was
bringing in a lot of money (Late night show September 2016) Heleen also, kept on
emphasizing the amount of money she was earning and was going to earn from the
selfies.
I know, I might not be the first to write about Heleen on this blog, but
there are many women out there making naked photo’s in the name of art and
money. I would call this an individual choice that bothers all women. This
would have to change, but how? Pollock
thought of challenge and replacement of these images in a notion of a woman as
a signifier, an ideological discourse in which one can identify the meanings
that are attached to woman in different kinds of images, and how meanings are
constructed to other signifier in that discourse. (226) In this way, Pollock
was amending a system through which those images depicting a woman’s weakness
would be limited. A measure to be taken was making of parallels of images of men
in a similar position as that of a woman (127). So, if we consider the photos of Van
Royen, we would also have a man making ‘penisselfies’ to realise that balance. But I am afraid there might
be few men ready to make penisselfies.
While measures were being taken to ensure that the image of a woman is
improved in visual media in 1972. In the 21century it seems that women have
emerged from a collective picture of womanhood to an individualistic state.
Another example is that of Sheeba Karungi a Ugandan female singer who doesn’t draw parallels of womanhood to herself. She is of the view that her body was
given to her to be used for a survival and even her mother supports her. “There
are many people out there who would love to have a gaze at nice woman body. Why
not using it”? So, if all is right, one might choose an individualistic side of
womanhood, and also thus draw conclusions that it seems that women’s representation
in art is at a larger extent an individual choice. And that though individual
choice unfortunately affects the entire womanhood.
References
Pollock, Griselda,
"What's Wrong with Images of Women", Screen Education, 1977, no. 24,
pp. 126-128
Hombert, The
late night show, RTV, (2016, September)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1CBI__iSk
https://www.ze.nl/artikel/210533-holy-moly-heleen-van-royen-maakt-vaginaselfie
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten